.

Saturday, December 21, 2013

Wilkinson

nton2 Q. B. QUEENS BENCH DIVISION. .57 WILKINSON v. DOWNTON. ActionCause ofNervous Shock mulish Joke causingBemoteness of Damage. The suspect, by way of a practical joke, falsely represended to the plaintiff, a married woman, that her husband had met with a right-hand(a) accident whereby twain his legs were broken. The defendant made the mastery with constituent that it should be believed to be true. The plaintiff believed it to be true, and in flake suffered a violent nervous shock which rendered her bronchitic: Held, that these facts utter(a) a good cause of action. Victorian Railways Commissioners v. Coultas, (1888) 13 App. Cas. 222, and Allsop v. Allsop, (1860) 5 H. & N. 534, considered. FURTHER CONSIDERATION 1897 MayS. ~ before Wright J. after trial with a jury. On April 9, 1896, Thomas Wilkinson, the husband of the plaintiff, went to a race-meeting, and on the even of the alike day the defendant came to the plaintiffs house and represent ed to her that her husband, eyepatch reverting in a wagonette with some friends from the races, had met with an accident and had both his legs broken, that he was lying at The Elms publichouse at Leytonstone, and had desired the defendant to supplicate .
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
the plaintiff to go at once with a hacker and some pillows to fetch him home. These statements were false. They were meant by the defendant to be believed to be true, and the plaintiff so believed them, with the result that she became seriously ill from a shock to her nervous system. She also on the organized religion of the defendants statement incurred a small e xpense for railway fares of persons whom she! sent to Leytonstone to consider after her husband. The jury assessed the expense of the railway fares at Is. IOJCZ., and the amends for the injury caused by the nervous shock at 100Z. It was contended on behalf of the defendant that so far as the detriment caused to the plaintiff -by nervous shock was concerned the action could non be supported. Warburton, and A. N....If you want to get a full essay, army it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment