.

Monday, February 4, 2019

One Man, One Vote? Essay -- essays research papers

whiz Man, One Vote?     Joseph Farkas call ups that e very(prenominal) balloting chuck should equal both other choose.He feels that many population be voting without go to sleeping why they are voting for a veritable somewhatbody or why they arent voting for a nonher. He says that a vote castby a person with no or very little noesis in the preference should non count asmuch as a vote cast by a person who populates alot almost the election. The peoplewho care about who has an important single-valued function in the political sympathies should squander a bigsay in who is going to have that important role. The votes cast by a person whodoesnt really know why they are voting for someone should non equal as much asan election educated person.     I do non think that this is a good idea at all. It would not upholdpeople to learn more about the election but hold open them away from the voting area.It will probably watch peopl e not want to vote because many of them would thinkthat their vote will not mean as much to the election. It would make the peoplewho are beaten(prenominal) with the candidates want to vote because they would have abigger say in who gets elected. It would be very hard to decide who know whatabout the campaign candidates and issues that are being addressed. They wouldhave to give some kind of multiple-choice question test that you had to fill out firearm voting. It would take a long time for each person to vote and I think thatwould make people less encouraged to observe and vote. Sin... One Man, One Vote? Essay -- essays research papers One Man, One Vote?     Joseph Farkas thinks that every vote cast should equal every other vote.He feels that many people are voting without penetrative why they are voting for acertain person or why they arent voting for another. He says that a vote castby a person with no or very little knowledge in the electi on should not count asmuch as a vote cast by a person who knows alot about the election. The peoplewho care about who has an important role in the government should have a biggersay in who is going to have that important role. The votes cast by a person whodoesnt really know why they are voting for someone should not equal as much asan election educated person.     I do not think that this is a good idea at all. It would not encouragepeople to learn more about the election but keep them away from the voting area.It will probably make people not want to vote because many of them would thinkthat their vote will not mean as much to the election. It would make the peoplewho are familiar with the candidates want to vote because they would have abigger say in who gets elected. It would be very hard to decide who know whatabout the running candidates and issues that are being addressed. They wouldhave to give some kind of multiple-choice question test that you had to fi ll outwhile voting. It would take a long time for each person to vote and I think thatwould make people less encouraged to come and vote. Sin...

No comments:

Post a Comment