QUANTITATIVE REASONINGThe research need involving the experimental treatment of 12 prostate genus Cancer patients clinically diagnosed at stage 4 showed that the entertain livelihood span after treatment was 10 .75 , with a standard deviation of 11 .02 It is known that the blotto intent span of untreated prostate cancer patients at the same clinical stage 4 is 9 .6 , with a standard deviation of 3 .2 . The difference in life span between the experimental and the control assemblys is not cheering enough to convince the committee that the novel treatment for prostate cancer is effective enough for further testing . In addition , the standard deviation derived from the experimental assort indicates that the distribution of the life spans of these 12 patients were scattered along a simple(a) range , unlike that of the u ntreated or control congregation , which shows a smaller standard deviation value of 3 .2 .
The lower standard deviation value of the control chemical group is more reliable because it reflects that there are little differences in the life span of the patients in this groupThe size of the work scarper is also questionable because only 12 prostate cancer patients were included in the study . If the research study is stiff to be an experimental treatment or clinical trial run , it would be more convincing if a big study population were involved in the investigation . A larger study group would eliminate c hances of bias and would also be resistant t! o outliers or values that are extremely exalted or low . It is...If you want to get a high essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment