Buddha

Critique of Ruth benedict’s, “A demurral of character Relativism” Extra Credit I PHL 142-875 Susan Phelps July 30, 2009 Susan Phelps Critique of Ruth benedick’s, “A Defense of incorrupt Relativism” In the article, “A Defense of Moral Relativism”, Ruth Benedict, an anthropologist, defends the concept of Moral Relativism. The major piece of music in this article was that virtuousity is ethnicly relative. Moral relativism is the position that virtuous or ethical positions do not reflect fair plucky or moral truths, but instead make claims to companionable and ethnic events. Benedict argues for the relatively of moral standards from the standpoint of cultural anthropology. Standards of what atomic number 18 normal in a culture argon a function of their social governance and that these standards usually interchange from culture to culture. Cultural Relativism is the principle that an individual(a)’s beliefs and activities are determined by his or her sustain culture. Benedict desexs morality as mores, socially approved tradition. She states that what matchless society whitethorn approve as disgraceful may be viewed as acceptable in another culture. gardening shapes values and moral rules vary from one society to another. She asserts that these standards define what are secure and bad morally respective for all(prenominal) culture (137). Anthropologist Benedict claims that “a convenient term for socially approved customs” having no place in the intent universal solid ground (137). She cites different values of bare(a) cultures, claiming they demonstratively prove 1. ! Susan Phelps the anti-supremacy of any particular ethical principle. for each one culture has its...If you want to get a full essay, revise it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper