Rhetorical Analysis †“Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior” Essay

P arenting is al behaviors a debatable event in America. E actually individual has an look on how a tiddler should be raised(a) and disciplined. In Amy Chuas wherefore Chinese Mothers Are Superior (an cite from Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother), Chua excuses Chinese parenting and how it is good in her life. She claims that by true(p) luck down a child and pushing them to their full potential, the child will, in turn, be convinced(p) and incredibly conquestful. Through the single-precious function of several rhetorical devices, Chua supports, as come up as weakens, her claim and expresses a different, moot counselling of parenting.An important element in Chuas argument is her ethos. She is make believely an expert individual, given that she is a professor at Yale University. Putting aside her credentials, this essay brings by a distinct character. From the start, she identifies herself as a tough and strict Chinese experience. Throughout the piece she uses several ad hominem experiences that support this assertion. The indorser recognizes a virtuoso of confidence from Chua as she repeatedly contrasts westbound-parenting i switchs from Chinese-parenting ideals. As far as her believability as an author, it is questionable. She writes, Chinese parents believe that their kids owe them everything.The crusade for this is a little unclear Her credibility begins to slip when she uses the word unclear. This educational activity suggests that she does non even know herself wherefore she is parenting the way she is parenting. It similarly presents a perfect tense opportunity for opposing people to garner an argument against Chuas style of parenting. another(prenominal) instance where Chuas credibility becomes uncertain is when she writes of mimicking her husband when he intervenes in a dispute between her and their daughter. It shows that she is unwilling to take heed to the other side of her argument and has this my-way-or-the-highway min gledwhich is not necessarily an attractive learning ability to put on. It seems that an author who is open to looking at both sides of an argument is a often respectable author.Chuas use of pathos is particularly insensitive. She uses it more to take a jab at westbound refining rather than to piddle an appeal on either side. Several time Chua makes up these hypothetical scenarios and discusses what westerly parents would do and because what Chinese parents would do. Her idea of how westerly parents defend is seemingly dead on however there is a sarcastic strengthen sanely it. What is in reality interesting about her emotional appeal is that she quotes her husband who opposes ane aspect of her argument. He says, Children dont choose their parentsso its the parents tariff to provide for them, which is an appeal to Western parents. She without delay shuts his argument down alone fails to explain why it is a terrible deal for the Western parent. This only weake ns her claim because, again, she is not being open-minded. In the end, Chua makes a very general appeal by saying, every last(predicate) comely parents want to do whats beat out for their children. It is confusing because this statement somewhat qualifies her claim. First, she refutes Western parenting, then, comes back to say that Western and Chinese parents are all wholeness in the same in the way that they care for their children. Chuas motive is unclear.beyond Chuas strong opinions, she utilizes statistics and facts in her argument. The statistics at the root of the piece describe percentages of Western and Chinese gives who agreed that stressing academic success is not sober for children or that parents strike to foster the idea that learning is fun. The publication showed that 0% of Chinese mothers agreed and they, instead, valued the idea of successful children resulting from successful parenting. These types of statistics by all odds support Chuas Chinese mother pe rsona. The statistics also supported her claim of how much time Chinese parents put into component their children make academic achievements. It is difficult to implore with facts and data, however, Chua does not cite the sources of this data. For all the reader knows, she could have made it up. It may be a more functional analytic appeal if the studies she quotes were from a well-known and see source.Chuas choice of diction reflects affirmable exaggeration on Chuas behalf and  perplexity for the reader. It makes sense to exaggerate in nightspot to stress the point she is trying to make but it also triggers the reader to doubt and question, which does not help her cause. Referring to her daughter, she writes, calling her slobberwhen she acted extremely disrespectfully toward me. The idea of psyche acting extremely disrespectfully varies from person to person. It is very biased statement. There is no way to interpret how her daughter was really acting. Already having ex amples of Chuas ethos from this piece, it is practical to guide she is exaggerating. Chuas diction is also troubling, curiously when she writes, All decent parents want to do whats best for their children. What are decent parents and what is best for any child? She does not elaborate on these key terms. It is the beginning of an argument on definition. Like in the case of Chuas exaggeration, there is no way to determine what qualities a good parent has. There is no way for every parent to agree on a list of things that are best for children.Another technique the author uses to set down her point across is repetition. Numerous times throughout her essay Chua repeats two dustup at the beginning of a sentence, By contrast She is making it very clear that there are differences between Western parents and Chinese parents. This is effective because the reader is ceaselessly reminded that these two types of parents are not alike(p) in Chuas mind. There is also a bit of repetition in terms of actions of the author. It seems like there is a cycle of Chinese parenting in her life. She raised her daughters the way her parents raised her. Chuas tiro called her garbage when she acted inappropriate and Chua called her daughter garbage when she acted inappropriate. This cycle of Chinese parenting indicates that Chinese finish is unchanging or very problematical to change. Overall, through repetition, the reader gets a good sense of contrasting cultures.The intended interview for this argument is an element worth discussing. Chua was about likely aiming this piece specifically at Western parents. The argument is definitely attention-getting to any parent and is compelling tolerable to spark disagreement. Chua seems to want that reaction because the object of her essay was to contrast Chinese parenting and Western parenting and explain how Chinese parenting is more effectivein her opinion. It almost seems as though she wants to rub it in the faces of Western p arents, maybe even spark guilt. The effect she wants to have on her audience may be for them think about her claim and appraise their methods of parenting.As mentioned before, Chua claims that by criticizing a child and hammering academic success into his or her brain the child will nonplus to become a prosperous and confident person. Her purpose gets through to the audience but does not necessarily persuade them. She utilizes rhetorical devices that both support and weaken her argument. Chuas lifestyle is a result of how she was raised. In a sense, her piece is a dandy lesson for Western cultures about Chinese culture. Chua may or may not efficaciously explain why Chinese mothers are superior but, ultimately, she conveys a unique, if not altogether outrageous, idea of parenting directed at the reasonable Western parents.