Discretion in the Criminal Justice System Essay

Shifting the summate of courtesy within our judge system could be for better or worse, plainly why fix something thats not broken? Although about police officers handling discretion, Many police officers (and whole departments) prefer to focalisation on the justice aspects of police work getting offenders off the streets, responding to emergencies, marking big drug busts, and gener altogethery catching the bad guys. (Fuller, J. R. Pg. 6. ) No matter how much discretion you give an officer, its ultimately their choice to go for it.Although it is common throughout the criminal justice system, some authoritative figures arrogatet use discretion in a way to submit punishments they stay in accordance with established guidelines. In my opinion, depending on the scratchiness of the crime discretion should or should not be apply. For example, discretion should be employ for a first time offender for speeding but should not be used for a first time offender of rape. The police ar typically the first contact that young victims and delinquents exact with the juvenile justice system. As with adults, law enforcement serves as the gatekeeper to the justice system. (Fuller, J.R. Pg 17. ) It is extremely important for a police officer to make the decisiveness of introducing a juvenile to the justice system. The responsibility for authorities to use discretion is crucial for a juveniles future. With adults, less discretion could be used because they have a greater sense of morals. In straightaways society I have personally seen adults expect lenience just because, for example, they have a police organization bumper sticker. Enforcing the law for adults who are habitual offenders is necessary to uphold order. One can only commove society and the law so far at some draw a bead on you must face the consequences.As we talked about in class, the 3-strike rule is a fair method of deciding who should be held accountable. Three major studies were commission to e xamine police practices in detail and to update the 1931 Wickersham commission underwrite (National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, 1971). These let in the report of the presidents Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of rightness (1967) empower The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society (1967), a report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968), and a report of the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1973).Each of these commissions was a major undertaking by a walloping number of scholars and practitioners who focused on solving some of the problems in both policing and the criminal justice system as a whole. The commission reports include multiple proposals to tighten the controls over police discretion, including the use and abuse of force. (Alpert, Dunham. Pg. 11. ) Whether for impregnable or bad laws shape citizens views of beliefs, actions and character.Unfortunately not all systems of moralit y and discretion are used properly. Discretion should be used in moderation and to preserve order in society, not used in excessive amounts to threaten the laws purpose. In summary, I feel discretion is a necessity. With our overcrowded jails, police and judges need to use their training, insight and experience to keep the public safe from individuals that have no regard for the law. Bibliography * Alpert, Geoffrey P. Dunham, Roger GUnderstanding Police Use of Force Officers, Suspects, and Reciprocity. wolfram Nyack, NY, USA Cambridge University Press, 2004. p 11. * Hagan, F. (2011). Ch 1. Essentials of Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology (pp. 1-45). clean York, raw(a) York Prentice Hall, 3rd Edition. * Fuller, J. R. (2008). Juvenile Delinquency Mainstream and Crosscurrents. New York, New York Prentice Hall, 1st edition. * Owen, S. S. (2012). Foundations of criminal justice. Oxford Oxford University Press.